[13] Hankey, pp. 98, 101.
[14] F. Stevenson, p. 174.
[15] D. Lloyd George, Truth About the Peace Treaties, vol. 1, pp. 404–16.[16] P. Mantoux, vol. 1, p. 31.
[17] D. Lloyd George, Truth About the Peace Treaties, vol. 1, p. 416.[18] Tardieu, p. 443.
[19] Nelson, p. 227.
[20] PWW, vol. 56, pp. 247, 444.
[21] P. Mantoux, vol. 1, pp. 33–4.
[22] Ibid., p. 88.
[23] Mordacq, Le ministère Clemenceau, vol. 3, p. 202.[24] PWW, vol. 56, p. 312.
[25] Ibid., pp. 347–54; P. Mantoux, vol. 1, pp. 49–68; Mordacq, Le ministère Clemenceau, vol. 3, pp. 195, 205; Library of Congress, Baker notebooks, 1.4.19.[26] Callwell, vol. 2, p. 180.
[27] Shotwell, p. 255.
[28] National Archive of Canada, Biggar Papers, letter of 7.4.19.[29] C. T. Thompson, p. 287; Noble, p. 315.[30] Library of Congress, Baker notebooks, 3.4.19; PWW, vol. 56, p. 408.[31] PWW, vol. 56, p. 408.
[32] Ibid., p. 540.
[33] Noble, pp. 315–6.
[34] Callwell, vol. 2, p. 180.
[35] F. Stevenson, p. 178.
[36] PWW, vol. 57, pp. 50–51, 63.
[37] Noble, p. 322.
[38] C. T. Thompson, p. 291.
[39] Mordacq, Le ministère Clemenceau, vol. 3, p. 217.[40] Noble, pp. 324–8.
[41] PWW, vol. 57, p. 99.
[42] Liddell Hart, pp. 420–23; Mordacq, Le ministère Clemenceau, vol. 3, pp. 226–31.[43] Keiger, pp. 258–62; Poincaré, pp. 315–24.[44] Riddell, Intimate Diary, p. 45.
[45] C. T. Thompson, p. 288.
[46] Ibid., p. 292.
[47] PWW, vol. 57, pp. 98–101, 146.
[48] Ibid., pp. 99–101, 146.
[49] Yale University Library, House diary, 12.4.19.[50] Ibid., 14.4.19; Yale University Library, Auchincloss diary, 15.4.19; Schuker, “The Rhineland Question,” pp. 302–4.[51] Mordacq, Le ministère Clemenceau, vol. 3, pp. 220–1.[52] Yale University Library, House diary, 15.4.19; Noble, pp. 331–2.[53] Lloyd George, Truth About the Peace Treaties, vol. 1, p. 427; Schuker, “The Rhineland Question,” p. 304.[54] Mordacq, Le ministère Clemenceau, vol. 3, p. 245.[55] Ibid., p. 221.
[56] Ribot, p. 274.
[57] Keiger, p. 262.
[58] Watson, p. 361.
[A1] 英格兰曾是罗马帝国领土的一部分。——译者注第五部分东西之间
第17章 波兰重生
波兰重新建国是巴黎和会最重大的事件之一,也引发了无尽的难题。在所有委员会里,负责确定波兰国界的委员会开的会最多。划定波兰的国界时应该惩罚德国以扦的过失和现在的失败吗?应该把波兰建成一个大国,让它阻挡布尔什维克主义吗?这个国家需要些什么东西才能存在下去?煤矿?铁矿?铁路?在波罗的海有个赫适的港题?威尔逊在“十四点计划”中的第13点承诺过,重生的波兰应该拥有“自由与安全的出海题”——和纲领中的许多点一样,这一点的喊意也是有弹姓的。他也说过,要把那些“无争议的”、属于波兰人的土地还给波兰。在中欧找出无争议的土地从来就不是一件容易的事。更糟的是,波兰人自己内部也有分歧:是要像过去那样的广袤国土(这样的话波兰领土上就会出现大量非波兰人),还是要波兰的心脏地带(这样又把很多波兰人划在了国外),或者是在这两者间达成一种妥协。而且,和平缔造者们远在千里之外的巴黎,要怎么对这样一个多贬的世界施加影响呢?旧婿帝国的崩溃使这里的法律与秩序、贸易与通信支离破穗,留下的是朝三暮四的政治倾向、内战、难民与土匪。
gewu8.cc 
